Appointment to Impeachment- The Making of the Chief Justice Of India - Seeker's Thoughts

Recent Posts

Seeker's Thoughts

For Clearing the Blur Spot.

Popular Posts

Appointment to Impeachment- The Making of the Chief Justice Of India

Appointment of Supreme Court Judge Under the Constitution of India
 Article 123 – of the constitution of India describes the process for appointment and removal of judges of the Supreme Court. The currently sanctioned strength of the court is 30 judges (CJI+30).


According to Article 124(3), the following people can become s supreme court judge:
1- High court judge who held the post for five years or longer.

2- An advocate who has practiced in a High Court or Supreme Court for ten years or longer.
3-A distinguished jurist- technically this could include a scholar, though no judge has ever been appointed on this basis.
The general rule of thumb is that senior most judge of existing High Court should be considered for elevation to the Supreme Court's Judge vacancy. However, where a judge has demonstrated exceptional ability or character, the order of superiority can be supe    rseded. The reasons behind that judge being appointed need to be recorded in such cases.

Who appointed the judges of Supreme Court?
Under the Article 123, the judges of the Supreme Court are to be appointed by the president of India. However, unlike the procedure followed in other countries, such as the USA, the appointment of Supreme Court judges in India happens with involvement of the judiciary. Article 124 (2) says that the president shall appoint the judges.
After consultation with such of the judges of the Supreme Court for chief justice of India as the president may deem necessary for the purpose. For the appointment of any judge of the supreme court apart from the CJI, the article also says that the chief justice of India must be consulted.

Meaning of the “consultation” and role of the collegium in Appointments
Initially the fact that Article 124 only required a “consultation” with four senior most judges and the Chief Justice of India , meant that the central government had the final say, and could reject the views of the judges when it came to decide who would be appointed to the top court.

Chief justice NOT Decision – Maker
The collegium was expanded to include the CJI and the next four (up from two) senior- most judges. It was concluded that the CJI could only recommend judges for appointment after consultation with the other four judges, and any candidate must be supported by most of the collegium.

Collegium’s Recommendation Binding
Once the collegium makes recommendation to the president, the president can either accept it or send it back to the collegium for reconsideration. If the collegium once again recommends that candidate for appointment, the president is bound by the recommendation
The final position is thus that even though the formalities need to be performed by the president, the actual decision- making power when it comes to appointment of supreme court judges’ rests with the collegium.

Removal of Supreme Court Judges: Impeachment
While the judiciary still holds the cards when it comes to appointment of judges, they do not have to say when comes to the removal of judges. The power to remove judges from their office rests with the president, who can only do so after receiving duly supported requests from parliament.
The Supreme Court has formulated an ‘in-house procedure’ for complaints against judges of the high courts of Supreme Court (though not the CJI himself), which provides for inquiries to be set up by the CJI. The CJI can recommend the removal of a judge to the President and Prime Minister, BUT this is not prerequisite for the impeachment process.

The process of impeachment is described in Article 124(4) of the constitution and The Judges (inquiry) Act 1968. A judge can be removed on the ground of “proved misbehavior nor incapacity are defined but would include any criminal activity or other judicial impropriety.
the steps are as follows:
1-      An impeachment motion against the needs to be raised in either of the House of Parliament. The motion can only be admitted by the speaker in the Lok Sabha or chairperson (by default, the Vice-President) in Rajya Sabha if it has the required levels of support: 100 MPs in Lok Sabha or 50 MPs in Rajya Sabha.
2-     If the motion is admitted, a three-member committee is set up to investigate the allegations. The committee is made up of a Supreme Court Judge, the Chief Justice of any High Court, and a ‘distinguished jurist’ (read judge/lawyer/scholar) nominated by the speaker/vice-President.
3-     Once the committee prepares its report, this must be submitted to the Speaker/vice president, who then also shares it with the other house.
4-     Both Houses of Parliament then need to pass an ‘address to the President’ asking for the judge to be removed. To succeed, this needs to be passed by a 2/3 majority of the MPs present in each house during the vote, and the must also exceed the 50 percent mark in EACH HOUSE.
5-     If both addresses succeed, then the President can remove the judge from his position by Presidential Order

The same process applies for all judges of the High Courts or the Supreme Court- Including the Chief justice of India