Introduction: - India has slipped four positions in the last seven years.

According to the report, India performed
worst under the section “sanctions and protections”, scoring just above 60%
points, whereas it failed to match up to the expectations in five of the
sections including scope of the RTI Act, requesting procedures, exceptions and
refusals and measures taken to promote the Act, scoring just above 80% points.
What exactly the report reveals?
Report stated that one of the biggest problems
facing India’s RTI Act is the fact that it offers no protection to officials
(from sanctions) who “release information that shows wrongdoing”. Thus keeping
them open punitive actions for upholding the Act.
Though there’s a system in place to
redress the problem of public authorities who systematically fail to disclose
information or underperform (either through imposing sanctions provided in the
law are against officials and not authorities). Besides, that an information
commission can only recommend steps to the public authorities to promote
conformity with the law - this further weakens the information commissioner, the
report highlights.
What other problems India is facing?
Among other problems India’s act is
blanket exceptions in schedule 2 for various security, intelligence, research
and economic institutes, the report points out.
The Indian legal framework also does not
allow access to information held by private entities which perform a public
function, and several of the law’s exclusion, including for information
received in confidence from a foreign government, cabinet papers and
parliamentary privilege, are also problematic.
Right to information Amendment Bill, 2018
RTI amendment bill which empowers the
union government to decide the tenure, salaries allowance and other terms of
service of information commissioners at the centre and states.
1-
Currently, their
salaries and tenure are statutorily protected and are at par with those of the
chief election commissioners and election commissioners.
2-
RTI activists and opposition parties have been
expressing their strong reservation against the proposed amendments.
How RTI worked in India?
RTI adopted in 2005, it’s been more than a
decade, and it has had far reaching consequences on the governance of the
country. It played a very important role in exposing various scams and has
helped bring about accountability and transparency in the governance of the
country.
What is the reason behind India’s low
ranking?
India lags behind smaller countries mostly
because of the negligent and faulty implementation of the law. According to
transparency international India, which carried out the survey, the total number
of RTI pleas received during 2005-16 was 2, 43, and 94,951 and during the same
period, the number of second appeals filed to the CIC was 18.5 lakh.
Shortage of Staff and Digitization Issue
There are other reasons like shortage
of staff and digitisation issues have been a great flaw in working process,
there is an increasing vacancy in multiple state information commissions
including the CIC over 30.8 % or 48 out of total 156 posts are vacant for
information commissioners at the union and state level, there are only 12
states have filled all posts like state chief information commissioners and
information commissioners in their commission, leading to no vacancy. No state
chief information commissioners have been appointed for Andhra Pradesh, Jammu
& Kashmir and Nagaland.
No Accessibility of Online RTI
Despite a push for digitisation by the government, most states are yet to make RTI accessible online.
Despite a push for digitisation by the government, most states are yet to make RTI accessible online.
Problem of information sharing with citizen
in India has been a tendency to decline giving information due to which,
between 2005 and 2016, more than 18 lakh people had to knock on the door of the
information commissions for the second appeal.
Many Institutions are not under RTI
Many institutions including the CBI in India are still not within the purview of RTI act. Information is withheld under the gab of confidentiality and privacy, even in those matters that in no way violates national security or an individual’s privacy.
Conclusion
India ranks lower than smaller countries like
Afghanistan which adopted the RTI later than India, out of the 61 indicators;
there are nine indicators categories under which India’s point have been
downgraded. Due to lack of political will, the RTI act is not being implemented
in spirit. To empower the legislative framework is the foremost responsibility
of the government, but this can only be ensured when political parties and
citizens are guarded and are constantly pushing the government to not dilute
such a citizen empowering law.
Follow us on Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/seekersthoughts/
Follow Us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/notesseekers
Follow us on Facebook- https://www.facebook.com/seekersthoughts/
Follow Us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/notesseekers