The World Happiness Report (WHR) 2019 ranked 156
countries. India obtained 140th place in the index dropping seven places from
133 last year.
This year’s World Happiness Report focuses on
happiness and the community: how happiness has evolved over the past dozen
years, with focus on the technologies, social norms, conflicts and government
policies that have driven those changes.
Who
releases World Happiness Report?
World Happiness
Report (WHR) 2019 is released by UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
The top three
countries are Finland, Denmark and Norway, Iceland and the Netherlands.
People in war-torn South
Sudan are the unhappy with their lives, followed by Central African Republic
(155), Afghanistan (154), Tanzania (153) and Rwanda (152).
The happiness study
ranks the countries of the world on the basis of questions from Gallup world
poll. The results are then correlated with other factors, including GDP and
social security.
United States ranks
at 19th place for happiness, despite being one of the richest
countries in the world.
It is based on income,
healthy life expectancy, social support, freedom, trust and generosity.
While India’s performance on this can be attributed to several factors, there
is a fact that there is an intrinsic relationship between law and people’s
happiness.
The WHRs, over the
years, confirmed that people tend to have:
- Happiness and
community
- Happiness and
voting behaviour
- Poor mental health,
- A low score of subjective well-being and
- Poor perception about the governance and law and order, despite
high income levels.
Happiness has come to be accepted as a goal
of public policy. And this discourse has
given a fillip to a
new narrative where the interconnections between law, governance and happiness
are being searched.
Generosity is one of the six key variables used in
this Report to explain differences in average life evaluations. It is clearly a
marker for a sense of positive community engagement, and central way that
humans connect with each other. Chapter 4 digs into the nature and consequences
of human pro sociality for the actor to provide a close and critical look at
the well-being consequences of generous behaviour. The chapter combines the use
of survey data, to show the generality of the positive linkage between generosity
and happiness, with experimental result used to demonstrate the existence and
strength of likely cause forces running in both directions.
Happiness and voting behaviour
Happier population is any more likely to vote, to
support governing parties, or support populist authoritarian candidates.
The data suggest that happier people are both more likely to vote, and to vote for incumbents when they do so.
The evidence on populist voting is more mixed. Although unhappier people seem to hold more populist and authoritarian attitudes, it seems difficult to adequately explain the recent rise in populist electoral success as function of rising unhappiness- since there is little evidence of any recent drop in happiness levels.
The chapter suggests that recent gains of populist politicians may have more to do with their increased ability to successfully chime with unhappy voters, or to be attributable to other societal and cultural factors that may have increased the potential gains from targeting unhappy voters,
The data suggest that happier people are both more likely to vote, and to vote for incumbents when they do so.
The evidence on populist voting is more mixed. Although unhappier people seem to hold more populist and authoritarian attitudes, it seems difficult to adequately explain the recent rise in populist electoral success as function of rising unhappiness- since there is little evidence of any recent drop in happiness levels.
The chapter suggests that recent gains of populist politicians may have more to do with their increased ability to successfully chime with unhappy voters, or to be attributable to other societal and cultural factors that may have increased the potential gains from targeting unhappy voters,
Interconnections
between law, governance and happiness
Countries which have higher GDP and higher per
capita income are NOT necessarily happy, and that is shocking data. So, the new
link is found between happiness and rule of law.
In an environment
in which laws are gradually becoming reactive, regulatory and penalizing,
this directly impacts on the happiness. This can be understood by following
reports and examples---
1. Gross
National Happiness (GNH) by Bhutan:
The connection between
crime and happiness is understandable from the experience of Bhutan,
which introduced Gross National Happiness (GNH) as a measure of
good governance.
A great majority of the Bhutanese population are
happy (of whom 41 percent are extremely happy), and only 4 per cent
reported being victimized by crime over the last 12 months.
Further, the crime
rate in Bhutan is extremely low. A negative correlation between crime/victimization
and happiness is observed.
2. The Rule of Law
Index- By World Justice Project:
The countries
scoring high on the Rule of Law Index, a measure used by the World
Justice Project, are those who are higher on the index of happiness as
well. Among these countries are Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway, the
Netherlands and Austria. The fact that happiness ought to be part of
the agenda to improve rule of law, and vice versa, is a new thrust in the
emerging policy discourse in many countries and local jurisdictions. The institutionalisation
of a happiness framework as a measure of achievement for policy goals
is now being debated.
The World Reports on Happiness in
selected countries and their crime and victimization data present remarkable
trends. The impact of criminal victimisation on happiness is often negative.
Analysis from six nations, namely, Finland,
Denmark, Philippines, South Africa, India and Sri Lanka shows that at least
one of the four crime variables share an inverse relation with the
happiness score of the respective nation. This leads to the conclusion that
individuals living in nations with high crime rates are less happy and
satisfied than individuals living in nations with a comparatively lower crime
rate.
Happiness
Performance in Indian context-
Indian
constantly ranked low in happiness Index one after another, and there is direct
link between happiness and law in India as well. For Instance, we can see an example
of pending Court cases:
-
Laws and legal regimes are the distributors of unhappiness in many
ways. We have about 3.3 crore cases pending in various courts in the
country.
-
Each case is not a mere number. It involves tension, anxiety
and deprivation to all those associated with it.
-
A group of people family members, relatives, friends and others of
the parties involved are necessarily affected because of such cases.
-
If we presume that there are about 20 persons in each case
belonging to one or the other parties, we get a number of about 64 crores.
-
Interestingly, none of them would be in a state of happiness
on account of being linked to the case.
-
Inevitably, the criminal justice administration for these
people is a source of unhappiness.
Moreover, not
more than 30 per cent people approach the courts in India. There is
a visible decline in civil litigation, which suggests that a large
number of people in the country are living with unresolved conflicts.
Criminal justice has
far-reaching consequences for the lives of people as it brings difficulties
when it does not act; it causes turbulence when it does.
Millions of
accused, victims, suspects, witnesses and others have poignant tales about the
actions and inactions of the criminal justice administration.
The satisfaction
level of people is far too low in this country when it comes to the police
and courts.
Conclusion:
The ideologies
promoted by the government also have an effect on the overall satisfaction
of the people besides poverty, unemployment and other issues of sustenance, the
outlook of the government on religion, gender, sexuality, etc. also
determine the contentment of the governed.
For example, in
India, increasing incidents of cow vigilantism, communal and gender bigotry
ultimately make the society intolerant and dissatisfied.
It is probably time
to shift the discourse of policy making towards the larger satisfaction
of the people with the public institutions they have to regularly approach for
various purposes.
It is; perhaps,
time to turn the narrative of law, policy and development, towards
building a happier society.
No comments:
Post a Comment